Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Comment on Chandra Muzaffar interview,New Age Islam Oct 7,2009

COMMENTS
10/7/2009 12:42:29 PM Shamshad Elahee Ansari-Dubai (U.A.E.)
Muslims must defy Islam-supremacism before they can hold credible inter-faith dialogue

In response to the interview with Chandra Muzaffar; Malaysian Islamic scholar by Yogendra Sikand, I would like to comment followings:
Islamic Supermacism concepts amongst Muslim community is the result of Muslim clergy who don’t see progressive Islamic scholar eye to eye. They are the one who instills this falsehood amongst innocent Ummah which is in the interest of Muslim Kingdoms, leadership etc. Islamic Clergy has been playing a role of subservient to their masters (rulers), they are the one who rules the roots in entire Muslim world, India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Indonesia etc. thru Mosque and Madarsas network. A layman believer will follow the dictates of local mosque Mulla in case of he/she finds an issue pertaining to their religion, identity, social security or even political issue. The progressive stream of Islamic scholar could not penetrate this vital structure which is governed by traditionalist forces, they have produced a Jin like Taleban and to some extent Al Qaida now which has created a violent political havoc and spreading their sectarian ideology throughout the world. They are not sparing liberal scholars within Sunni community but also fanning sectarian factionalism within Muslims like Shiite vs Sunnis.
Unfortunately, so-called progressive Muslim intellectuals or religious leaders like Obaid ullah Sindhvi , Maulana Azad, Iqbal, Hasrat Muhani to Wahiduddin Khan or Asghar Ali Engineer did not have powers or has it at present to penetrate Mosque-Madarsa institution. This is the strongest institute within Islamic community which has a sway of power over the mind of Muslim populace. They all are sitting at their own seats and writes or talks in absolute isolation, they really don’t have any direct interaction with the community and neither they have any strategy to combat this situation i.e. how to counter the Mulla-Madarsa nexus?
Above reference can paint a very grim and pessimistic view of this present situation but there is a ray of hope ahead. We have plenty of Muslim scholars in every part of the world who are trying to assert themselves and posing a direct threat to Mulla-Madarsas nexus, they are asking relevant questions? They are demanding Ijtihad, they are pressing for reforms, they are trying to move Muslims and requesting them to see a fresh light. More they create awareness amongst literate Muslims, more they are close to their targets. Time has come to develop new Mosque parallel movement in the community to isolate fundamentalist Mulla bandwagon. Time has come to issue a public statement for common Muslim to stop paying anything to Mosque-Madarsas. Time has come to give a Call to stop making parasites or Taliban like creature thru Madarsas and to build modern learning institutes so that their products could survive as an honorable citizen of the main stay society. Madarsa’s product is compelled to live at the behest of Muslims or live in hidings like Taliban . Let us stop this pattern immediately; otherwise it will be too late. They are producing a large army of such elements who can prostrate before Taliban like forces if the call is given.
They will be the one; they are armed with such mindset, that they would behead first the Progressive Scholars of Muslims to clean it from disease.
As far as Islamic Banking concept is concerned, there is nothing difference in western banking system and so-called Islamic banking system. Only interest is termed PROFIT.
The owners of these so-called Islamic Banking is not doing any novel activity, they are just capitalizing on the general psychology of common Muslim man who has money but if see, Halal or Islamic, he will buy that product first, all due to either his so-called superiority complex or his/her faith and beliefs etc. Muslim Industrialist has cunningly read this and marketed their product accordingly. Now, it has become multi-billion dollars market world wide. Its nothing, but a marketing strategy of Muslim bourgeoisie.
It’s a long battle, let’s see how things would take turn in next 10-20 years…!!!


Sincere regards


Monday, October 5, 2009

Comments on Ravi Shankar Maulana Wahiduddin New Age Islam Oct 3

COMMENTS
10/3/2009 1:45:43 PM Shamshad Elahee Ansari - Dubai (U.A.E.)
Say it Talk or an interview with Maulana Wahiduddin Khan and Sri Sri Ravi Shankar under the caption War and Peace, It’s in The Mind. Thanks to New Age for re-producing this article from TOI and many thanks to those readers who spared their time to indulge in a debate on the issue. All religion defends the Platonic theory on priority and superiority of Mind over matter. We have not a single case in the entire human history that there is any civil disobedience against any rule without objective condition. Objective conditions are the mother of a thought/idea/ideology or say it mind. Sri Sri Ravishankar/Maulana and even Mr Ashok Chowgule are the products of specific conditions. Objective Condition/Matter is the primary source for the idea, It can lead Buddha to go to jungle in search for Nirvana, conditions could lead a small time thief Ajmal Kassab to come to India along with his compatriots on a so-called Jihad mission and kill innocent civilians, Conditions is the First and foremost factor that it can give a super constitutional authority to Mr Chowgule to put to test any Muslim citizen in India for trustworthiness, religious beliefs etc. Actually both are ugly face of same coin.
Instead of welcoming this great moment and great efforts on the part of two dignitaries, who are an authority in their respective field, Mr. Chowgule has targeted the integrity of Malauna, who really don’t need any certificate from anyone, including Sang Parivar and its progenies to prove his credentials. Communal Forces cannot accept any such action which can unite the followers of two different religions. They will always welcome the acts of divide, they need only Ajmal Kassab, not any act of unity.
Let me come again on the philosophical aspect of the debate. I disagree to this reference that WAR is the state on mind. WAR is an objective reality. It has it economy, it serve some vested interest, and RELIGION has played a very important role to fill the coffers of rulers. Let us be objective on Jihad, it’s a billion dollar industry, Jihadi are being sold and purchased, to make this job easy, they use IDEOLOGY. Islam is the most salable commodity to produce Jihadi and in turn, we have a Counter jihadi force.
If Ajma Kassab and Ashok Chowgule are the faces of same coin, so please don’t be surprised if you may come to know, Afghan Jihadi-Anti War Forces are two sides of the same coin.
Please debate this issue, take this issue to the grassroots, Let us hope, the ignorant people will see the light of the truth themselves, without any help of any Guru or Maulana.
Best Regards