Monday, May 24, 2010

Question of Ayaan Hirsi and Islam


I am aware of Ayaan Hirsi since she created ripples in Holland though I am not aware of her writing and her approach, how she is defining Islam? She is not the only one who reject divinity of the book, there were several intellectual and scholars who did the same and paid hefty prices, some of them lost their lives as well. Islam is the only religion who successfully propagated a false notion that there is no any Prophet after Mohammed and Quran is the book of Allah, divine and thus above from any amendments. It has been a bone of contention for the intellectuals and has been debating the issue, IRON fisted Govt in the name of Islam has been instrumental to implement this dogma as it was in their favour. Islam failed within 30 years of its inception, Prophet's body was allowed to lay in desert for seven hours as different factions remained to sort out the leadership issue. Mohammed was the shrewdest politician who created such a system, particularly to control Bedouin (Arab Tribe) with a iron hand and designed a system which if fool proof of any kind of dissention. And he was utterly successful in his efforts. The total period of Four so-called rightly guided Caliphs ended in 30 years which was faced with various problems, civil wars and many Caliphs was brutally murdered still, Islam survived just because of the fact that KING understood is properly and implemented it successfully. Islam was mainly divided in two camps, one for rulers who did not adhere to any of its teaching and did whatever suits them and lived a lavish life and second was for masses. Sharia was created during the rule of Abbasids so it has all such ingredients which are necessary for a KING to rule safe.
Now the problem is that due to that 1400 years old system which Islamic states has created has become a force to reckon with. What we see now a days, a critical wave against Islam is actually a latest phenomenon, its post 9/11 phenomenon. They only started crying when West felt the first burnt. Otherwise, whole US administrations, Pentagon were behind creating a Islamic resistance against progressive movements in third world countries and some states as well. They continued to ignore all human right violation in entire Middle Eastern states in order to make sure safe and sound supply of Oil and make money thru their MNCs working that part of the world. Middle Eastern countries also created one state two systems for the Westerners, a US, UK citizen is still being treated like their God father in entire gulf region so they did not faced any problem. Entire gulf states are being run on the basis of South Asian immigrants and these states do not take any responsibility for them. Its a separate issue, but West kept close their eyes on such issues. Why question of Ayaan is so prominent now? Why west really waited to worsening this situation? Their conscience is not clean and clear.
There is no dearth of Muslims who believes in critical Islam, who wants to see its growth with the science? How can we forget the Turkey was the country who burnt Veils on its squares under Pasha in 1920 when we as Indian were demanding Ottoman Empire to be restored under Gandhi (Khilafat Movement)? How we can forget that there was a great wave of support in south asian sub-continent for progressive Muslims? How we can forget that Muslim community contributed a long line of progressive leadership in Muslims, right from Sajjad Zahir to Faiz Ahamd Faiz, Muzaffar Ali, Z A Ahmed and many more in different walk of life. Who created that atmosphere that we are forced to forget them and now there is a literal vacuum of progressive Muslim leadership. How can we forget that George Habbas, Leila Khalid were the iconic faces in the entire middle east during 1970s, they were all who rejected the Islam which was enforced by the King and its lackeys i.e. Mullas.
Situation is really very critical, the was Ayaan Hirsi is being projected will not yield desired result. We need to have a comprehensive approach toward the problem and force Western powers to pressurise Gulf states to change their characters, Only restoration of a democratic governments and nullification of kingdom ship will help to people to have an alternative in their lives i.e. political system, theories, religion etc. The present system of governance in Middle Eastern countries has turned their people into parasites (Kuwait, UAE, Qatar and large section of Saudi population) etc. Local people don’t give any shit to anything since they gets best material and life to support them without doing nothing. Five times prayers are just a ritual, cultural practice for them and donning white ‘Choga/Kandoora’ just to make a visible difference between them and expatriates otherwise they are not worried about anything. They will remain like this for another 200 years unless; west don’t put pressure to bring some internal changes in these countries.
The present scenario is really not very favourable for Muslim intellectuals, they are under threats, they are not in a position to defend Salman Rushdie, Tasleema Nasrin or Ayaan but it does not means that they don’t like change? They all believe the absolutist and finalist agenda of Islam either? They are under pressure of their own circumstances, their objective conditions are pathetic. But, still some people are fighting tooth and nail by risking their lives, just have a look of http://www.newageislam.com/ and you can come to know what they are doing? See Tarek Fatah and his group in States and Netherland and see what they are doing? Things are really not very encouraging for New Light Muslims but some of them are really doing a good job:
I will conclude my comment with a Urdu couplet:
“Kyun Zulmat-e-Firak se Ghabra Raha Dil,
Ho jayegi saher bhi, gar sham hui hai”

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

On Maulana Maudoodi-Comments on New Age Islam Dt 19,2010

Dear Editor,
Please accept my gratitude for the selection of article of Raziq on Maudoodi. I have been reading various articles on the same subject on this site in the past by various notable authors. Maudoodi is a definite phenomenon of our sub-continent since it has been his world of learning, evolution of his thoughts and their implementation and now we are debating the repercussions of the existence of Maudoodi’s thoughts in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.
One important aspect I used to miss while assessing Maudoodi that it do not include the analysis of historical conditions which determine and shape the thinking process of an individual, neither the writers evaluate his contemporary national situation nor his personal desires or contribution. Maudoodi was born in Aurangabad Sep 25,1903 to a cleric of Chishtiya silsila. He founded Jamat-e-Islami (Lahore) on August 26,1941 after various topsy turvy routes of his career. 1941 was a time when not only India was boiling but the whole world was witnessing most gruesome act of human history. The backdrop of second world war was very important and we are not surprised that why communal mind(s) of India like RSS and Jamat-E-Islami, Muslim Brotherhood supported Hitler? Maudoodi was trying to search for his place in the fast changing situation of not only then India but as a whole world and thus he crafted a new path for him which, according to him was absolute way as a ‘trooper of God’. His evaluation but be done with his contemporaries of RSS in Indian perspective like Guru Golwarkar (Nagpur,1906-1973)the second chief of RSS after K.B. Hedgewar (Nagpur,1889-1940) who founded most lethal Hindu rightist organisation in India in 1925. The distance between Aurangabad and Nagpur is about 500 kilometre but both cities has one thing in common, they produced ideologues of a sinister ideology which divided mankind and sowed such venomous seeds that we still have to weed them out. Germany has taught a lesson to the proponents of Hitler but we have yet to teach the lesson to the lackeys of Hitler from our sub-continent.
Hope, the quest will continue and I am sure, I can see the writing of the wall, their end is imminent. I met an encounter on Facebook with some Pakistani friends who Called Jamat-e-Islami as Jamat-e-Harami or JH instead of JI. Only they (Pakistani) can bury the ghost of Maudoodi since they are the worst sufferer of this heinous ideology which is based upon the crime against humanity.
Regards